![]() Last edit at 04:44PM by JohnHell.Īre you porting KM to 16 bit Windows 3.1? Or is someone else? Or are you trying to inspire/find someone to port it?Įither way, I was recently looking at KM for Windows 98. In my opinion, it doesn't worth, unless pages are very basic.Įdited 1 time(s). Very basic webpages would work then, and without forget that almost any page to date is served under HTTPS, and it will be a miracle to be able to access the servers in first place, but any way or the other, don't expect modern web (mainstream sites like Twitter, Facebook, etc) on anything earlier than version 74 and, even then, with barely current web standards support, even HTTPS support. It will be as going back to Firefox 1 or 2.0 or so. If 1.1.6 doesn't run (I don't understand what you mean by perfectly) you should start going backward as of 0.8.2 or even earlier, but, then, we are talking about versions that, if 1.1.6 isn't capable of modern web, by its aged engine, earlier means worst. ![]() You should try the MSFN forums for advices on kernel updates for the operating system, or something similar, to be able run updated software on it. Modern web-browsing and Windows 95 in the same phrase is. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |